Innocent Until Proven Guilty

Why We Must Restore Due Process to DHR Investigations

In America, you are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. But in Alabama’s current child welfare system, citizens can be branded with a "scarlet letter" before they ever see a judge, hear the evidence against them, or have a chance to defend themselves.

This practice effectively creates a system of "guilty by accusation."

Placement on the DHR Central Registry isn't just a list; it is a life sentence of reputational ruin. It frequently leads to the loss of employment, professional disqualification, and barriers to occupational licensing. It can destroy a family's standing in the community, even when the allegations are entirely unsubstantiated.

The Arrogance of Unchecked Bureaucracy

This is what happens when empowered bureaucrats are left unchecked. They begin to believe that their suspicion is a substitute for evidence, and that their authority is a substitute for the law. They always think they are right.

Without due process, there is no one to tell them otherwise. They operate in the shadows, making life-altering decisions without oversight, confident that they know better than parents, better than judges, and better than the Constitution. They view families not as citizens with rights, but as subjects to be managed.

The DHR Central Registry and Due Process Act (2026 Draft) ends this overreach. It prohibits DHR from placing an "indicated" report on the central registry unless that finding is confirmed by an investigative hearing.

Restoring Rights and Accountability

This bill forces the system to respect the rights of the accused. It establishes fundamental due process rights at the investigative hearing, including:

It also demands professionalism. The bill mandates training for DHR employees and requires them to notify a subject that they are under investigation—ending the practice of secret inquiries that blindside parents.

Stopping the Overreach

Perhaps most importantly, this legislation limits the use of DHR reports in criminal proceedings. It restricts the service of criminal warrants based solely on DHR records unless a grand jury has returned an indictment. This ensures that the lower standard of proof used by a state agency cannot be used to bypass the constitutional protections required for criminal charges.

This bill protects children while strengthening due process, registry accuracy, staff training, and accountability within DHR.

Breaking — February 17, 2026

The Bill Has Dropped: HB464

Representative Paschal has introduced House Bill 464, the DHR Central Registry and Due Process Act. It was filed today and referred to the House Judiciary Committee. This is exactly what we have been calling for.

Everything outlined in this editorial is now in the bill. Read below for what HB464 does.

What HB464 Does

Due Process Before the Registry. Under current law, DHR can place you on the statewide central registry as “indicated” without a hearing. HB464 changes that. No indicated finding goes on the registry until the subject has been given the opportunity for an investigative hearing—or has waived that right in writing. You get your day in court before the state brands you.

Higher Evidence Standards. The bill replaces the vague “threatened harm” standard with “imminent harm”—a higher, more specific threshold. It redefines neglect to require that inadequate food, shelter, medical treatment, or supervision “poses a substantial risk of harm to the child.” Poverty is not abuse, and this bill makes that clear in the statute.

Credible Evidence Defined. For the first time, Alabama law will define “credible evidence” as evidence corroborated by a third party who is not employed by or contracted with DHR, or unambiguous physical evidence. DHR investigators can no longer mark you “indicated” based solely on their own uncorroborated opinion.

Criminal Justice Firewall. HB464 prohibits law enforcement from using a DHR indicated report to establish probable cause for a criminal warrant. Any criminal warrant relying on DHR records must be returned for indictment by a grand jury before it can be served. DHR reports are not admissible as evidence in criminal cases. This stops the backdoor criminalization of families through the administrative system.

Dismissed Charges = Vacated Findings. If a court dismisses criminal charges based on the same allegations, DHR must vacate the indicated finding, remove it from the registry, and—if the child was removed—file a motion for immediate reunification with the parent.

Not Indicated = Purged. “Not indicated” reports can no longer sit on the registry for five years waiting for you to request expungement. The bill requires automatic, retroactive removal of all not-indicated reports. They cannot be disclosed for employment, background checks, or any other purpose.

Mandatory Training & Legislative Reporting. DHR investigators must be trained on separating personal feelings from professional judgment, family preservation services, and criminal standards for abuse and neglect. The department must submit an annual report to the Legislature with detailed data on hearings, removals, reunifications, and pick-up orders.

Effective Date: October 1, 2026.

Now It’s Your Turn

The bill is real. It is filed. It is in the House Judiciary Committee. But bills die in committee every session because nobody shows up to demand they move. This one cannot die.

Call your Representative. Tell them you support HB464 and you want it moved through Judiciary. If your Representative is on the Judiciary Committee, tell them to vote yes. If they are not, tell them to talk to the committee members and the chairman.

Share this page. Every Alabama family who has been through a DHR investigation knows someone else who has. Forward this to them. Post it. Talk about it at church, at work, at the school pickup line.

HB464 protects children and restores due process. It does not weaken child protection—it strengthens it by requiring real evidence, real hearings, and real accountability. Support it.

Share this Editorial